DUBLIN
TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
The
appointment of the Dublin Transport Authority Establishment Team was announced
by the Minister for Transport, Martin Cullen TD, on 6 November 2005. The
Minister appointed Professor Margaret O’Mahony, Head of the Department of
Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering at Trinity College Dublin as
Chairperson of the Establishment Team. The Team's report was presented to the
Minister in March 2006 and was published by him on 9 November.
In
its report the Establishment Team recommended that:
·
The geographical remit of the Dublin Transport
Authority should encompass the entire Greater Dublin Area (GDA) i.e.
Dublin
City
itself and the counties of Fingal, Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown,
South Dublin
, Kildare, Meath and Wicklow;
·
The Dublin Transport Authority should have
overall responsibility for surface transport in the GDA;
·
The new Authority should have responsibility
for a broad range of functions, including Strategic Transport Planning,
Procurement of Public Transport Infrastructure, Procurement of Public Transport
Services, Regulation of Public Transport Fares, Delivery of an Integrated Public
Transport System, Traffic Management; Management of Transport Demand and Data
Collection & Research; and
·
The remit of the Authority include some
functions in relation to land use.
The
report stated that the Authority must have control of all State capital and
current funding for public transport and traffic management in the GDA. On the
other hand the Team recommended that responsibility for national roads' funding
within the GDA should be retained by the NRA, subject only to strategic
oversight by the Authority.
Dealing
with the relationship between the DTA and the CIÉ Group of Companies, the
Establishment Team's report recommended that there should be a direct
contractual relationship between the new Authority and the three operating
subsidiaries (Iarnród Éireann, Bus Átha Cliath and Bus Éireann) in respect
of the provision of public transport services. As part of this relationship, all
public service obligation payments and capital grant monies in respect of
services or works in the GDA should be paid by the DTA directly to the three
companies. The Authority should have powers to issue advisory guidelines and
mandatory directions directly to all companies in the CIÉ Group and also have
powers to decide the functions to be delivered by CIÉ or by any of its
subsidiaries. The Authority should also have powers to step-in and implement any
of these functions directly or assign them to a third party, if the performance
by the CIÉ Group proved unsatisfactory. CIÉ property disposal in the GDA
should be subject to the consent of the Dublin Transport Authority.
While
the three operating subsidiaries would remain part of the CIÉ Group, the
oversight of public transport operations in the GDA would become the primary
responsibility of the DTA, rather than that of CIÉ.
To
ensure that a coherent and integrated approach is applied to certain landmark
rail infrastructure projects, including Metro North, the St Stephen’s Green
Interchange and the ‘Interconnector’, the Team concluded that these should
be the responsibility of the DTA. The report also recommended that the Authority
should have responsibility for integrated ticketing functions and service
procurement in the GDA. Having regard to these considerations, the Team
concluded that the Railway Procurement Agency should be absorbed into the DTA.
In
launching the report the Minister accepted most of the Establishment Team’s
recommendations. However, the proposal regarding functions in relation to land
use was rejected as the Government was concerned that it ‘would unnecessarily
dilute the democratic accountability of the planning process’.
Responding
to the Establishment Team’s report, the RPA issued a statement saying that it
‘fully supports the setting up of a DTA where it can “add value” to the
work of existing bodies in the more effective implementation of Transport 21
projects in the Greater Dublin Area’. The Agency, however, does not support
the recommendation that the RPA be absorbed by the DTA, stating that the report
does not provide a credible explanation why a new State agency should replace
one, which is just five years old.
The
RPA’s statement went on to say that the Agency had built up a significant
level of momentum in the delivery of Transport 21 projects in the GDA, in
particular the Metro North project. It fears that the proposals contained in the
Establishment Team’s report would have the effect of delaying this momentum
and could also cause confusion among potential bidders for the largest Public
Private Partnership in the state.
The
remainder of this article appears in IRRS Journal number 162, published February
2007.

Copyright © 2007 by Irish
Railway Record Society Limited
Revised: February 18, 2007
.