Irish Railway Record Society

Home

CAHIR VIADUCT DERAILMENT REPORT

by Denis McCabe

The Railway Safety Commission (RSC) report on the derailment of a cement train at Cahir Viaduct on 7 October 2003 was published in August. The train consisted of locomotives 134+185 + 22 four-wheel laden cement wagons and was working the 03:35 Limerick-Waterford. The bridge structure was severely damaged in the derailment and the rear 12 wagons fell through its floor into the River Suir below. The driver was not hurt in the accident, but the line remained out of service until September 2004. Damage to rolling stock and the bridge was over €3m and therefore was classified as a ‘serious incident’ under EU Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC. The Directive requires that all serious railway accidents be investigated.

A Statutory inquiry into the circumstances of the accident was conducted by the Interim Railway Safety Commission (IRSC). The IRSC’s Inquiry utilised documentary evidence provided by IÉ and by consultants that IÉ engaged to assist in its own internal inquiry into the accident, verbal evidence given in interview by various parties involved either directly or indirectly in the accident, and data obtained directly by the IRSC in its various site inspections.

The report extends to 72 pages and extracts are noted below.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The report said ‘Examination of the site and recovered debris, and interviews with individuals directly involved in the accident, did not confirm the cause of the derailment. Similarly, the modelling of the viaduct and train dynamics conducted by IÉ’s consultants failed to predict conclusively any derailment mode. The analysis therefore seeks to eliminate the factors that it could be said with a reasonable degree of certainty had not materially contributed to the accident, and to consider the factors that remain’.

‘While it is not possible to state definitively what caused the accident, it appears that shortcomings in the timber deck structure of the viaduct and shortcomings in the associated inspection and maintenance regime were the most significant causal factors. If these had been fit for purpose it is unlikely that the accident would have occurred’.

‘IÉ was addressing some of these shortcomings at the time of the accident, and has since introduced or proposes to introduce remedial measures’. ‘A copy of this report in draft form, excluding the conclusions and recommendations, was forwarded to all interviewees for comment. Two responses were received, the content of which was taken into account in finalising the report’.

BACKGROUND

The report gave details of the train, track, Viaduct and weather. These are not reproduced here, but details of the Viaduct were provided in JOURNAL 153. The down direction is from Limerick to Waterford.

It noted ‘50kg/m flat-bottomed rail was laid up to and over the Viaduct, and terminating about 53m beyond the Waterford abutment. This was manufactured in 1977 and initially laid on the more heavily trafficked Limerick to Limerick Junction section of the railway before being cascaded to the Tipperary to Clonmel section in 1996. 87lb/yard (43kg/m) bullhead rail was laid from that point and continued through Cahir Station. On the approaches to the Viaduct, the track is of traditional ballasted type with timber sleepers. On the ballasted track and the Viaduct, the rails were seated on cast iron sole plates. These support the rail and give it an inward inclination from the vertical of 1 in 20. On the Viaduct itself, the rails and sole plates were connected to the way-beams with wood-screws. The track was laid in panels with rails joined by fishplates. For the 50kg/m rail the panel length was 36.6m. There were joints approximately 17m before the viaduct on each approach and on the Viaduct itself approximately 20m from each abutment’.

‘Two element types comprised the primary deck, the main longitudinal support girders and the transverse girders. All were originally fabricated from plate and angle sections riveted together but a number of the transverse girders at the Waterford end of the Viaduct had been replaced with rolled mild steel beams after an accident in 1955’.

‘The approximate dimensions of the main girders are 3500mm from top to bottom flange and 750mm between webs. At regular intervals along the girders, there are internal diaphragms between the webs. The transverse girders and beams, of which there were 95, spanned between the main box girders spaced at 915mm centres. They were approximately 8075mm long, with the exception of those at the abutments at each end of the deck that were of various lengths to accommodate the oblique angle of the Viaduct. The wrought iron transverse girders had a flange width of 230mm and a depth of 483mm, and the steel beams a flange width of 190mm and depth of 610mm. The wrought-iron girders were riveted to the inner webs of the main beams with their bottom flanges immediately above those of the main girders, the whole assembly forming a trough through which the railway passes. The deeper mild steel beams were fitted to the main girders with their bottom flanges set slightly below those of the main girders’.

‘The secondary timber deck structure was of way-beam type where the rails are carried on longitudinal timber beams instead of transverse sleepers. These way-beams were nominally 305mm wide and 305mm deep (12" x 12") and ran continuously under each rail across the Viaduct. They were attached to the transverse girders/beams by bolts, which in the case of the wrought iron girders passed through the top flange, and in the case of the steel beams had clips that gripped the outer edge of the top flange’.

‘Outside each way-beam there was a timber guard-beam, nominally 152mm wide and 406mm deep (6" x 16"). The guard-beams were staggered longitudinally relative to the way-beams. Their apparent purpose was to provide derailment protection. At approximately 3000mm intervals, timber transoms kept the way-beams apart. Long steel tie-rods prevented the way-beams from spreading and, together with shorter tie-rods, were used to hold the guard-beams and way-beams together’.

‘At every second way-beam joint there were pairs of steel flitch plates that were the same depth as the way-beams to which they were bolted on either side [Steel plates typically applied to the side of a timber structural member to provide added strength. In the case of the Viaduct, these plates also located and secured the way-beams]. The plates were approximately 2060mm long and spanned three transverse girders to which they were riveted. They were mounted at longitudinal intervals of 11.7m in staggered fashion, reflecting the probable original length and layout of the way-beams. The flitch plates helped to provide lateral, longitudinal and rotational fixity to the way-beams and, along with the staggered guard-beams they provided longitudinal continuity’. ‘The Viaduct was designed to accommodate two sets of railway tracks but carried only one set which was offset to the Up side of the deck centreline’.

The report gives details of the journey until the time of derailment, response to the derailment, pollution containment measures, recovery of the derailed vehicles, examination, testing and investigation. It also provided details of maintenance and inspection regimes of the train and viaduct. For space reasons, these are not included in this summary.

  The remainder of this article appears in IRRS Journal number 161, published October 2006.

Copyright © 2007 by Irish Railway Record Society Limited
Revised: January 09, 2007 .

Home Up